Genre and Judginess

If you know me, you know that some of my favorite shows have definite sci-fi elements: Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Firefly, Lost. Some of my favorite books are by Stephen King, or feature hobbits and elves.  Some of my favorite movies occur in a galaxy far, far away. This frequently causes me to be embarrassed when I talk about my faves with new people. (I imagine that while they are nodding and smiling they are thinking “You love Lord of the Rings and Buffy the Vampire Slayer? What a nerd you must be!”)

In the United States, there is a stigma associated with science fiction and fantasy programming that [I hear] doesn’t exist in other countries. And it’s kind of a shame because some of the best literature out there fits squarely into those categories. People who reject books, films, or television shows because they have a strong association with nerd culture are really missing out – I know, because I used to be one of them. My Critical Elements of Literature may not jibe with yours, but I hope they at least share an absence of genre restrictions. To me, that’s just a question about taste, not about merit.

There’s a difference between suspension of disbelief and inconsistency in literature, regardless of the genre or venue. Buffy’s universe has vampires (among other demons), Lost’s has the smoke monster (among other mysteries), and Firefly’s has space ships (but not aliens). All of this is perfectly acceptable to me, as long as the rules don’t change partway through. Or if they do change, the shift should come with an explanation that jibes with its home universe. [Side note: this brings me to a whole separate segment about when the rules inexplicably do change in some of the best programs, why this may be, and why it makes me crazy. More on this later.]

So the moral of this post is: don’t judge a piece of programming by its genre. It is fiction after all; who cares if it couldn’t actually happen in the real world?   If that’s what you want out of television, then perhaps reality tv or documentaries are more your style (these are also sometimes great).  But the wonderful thing about fiction is that it gives us an opportunity to ask ourselves “what if the world was this way?” A little suspension of disbelief goes a long way toward making the whole experience more enjoyable. That is why most of my favorite lit shows have some sci-fi, fantasy or otherwise “unrealistic” elements to them. I don’t care what genre category a show falls into – I just care whether it is good.

FAVES: Buffy the Vampire Slayer

Welcome to a segment that I’m going to call Faves. In these posts, I will discuss my favorite shows (which I will likely reference throughout my discussions) and why I think they are shining examples of TV Lit.

Of course the best place to start is with Buffy. If you know me, you know that I adore pretty much anything helmed by Joss Whedon. And the first, best example of his work is the wonderful show Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Like many people out there, I was initially put off by the title of this show. Vampire Slayer? How lame! And then I got to college, and had my eyes opened by The Enlightened crowd (especially by Hayley of The Daily Doyle and Phil of Instaflicka). I began with some of the quintessential episodes (“Hush,” “Once More with Feeling,” etc) then once I was hooked I started at the start and watched the whole series (thanks to the internet, the library, and Netflix). Now I own all seven seasons, and I have to admit I’ve seen most (possibly all) episodes more than once.

So what makes a show with such a [silly] premise so very wonderful? Well first, it satisfies all of the Critical Elements of Literature. With flying, dazzling color. Yes, there is a monster of the week. But there are also amazing character arcs through seasons and through the series. There are amazingly engaging storylines which have clearly been mapped out far in advance, so that there is a high degree of consistency that other shows simply can’t match. There is also a wonderful and unique combination of humor and heartache – signature Joss Whedon stuff.

And those monsters of the week usually represent something deeper going on with one or more of the characters at that point in the show. For example, in “Hush,” when everyone is getting bogged down by their own propensities for too much chatter and not enough meaningful interaction, monsters show up to steal all the voices – and by the end of the episodes it’s hard for the characters to find the words for each other.

There are a lot of literary elements in Buffy. I am sure that I will touch on them a lot more in the future. However, I also just want to emphasize how fun the show is just to watch, even without the intense engagement you feel with the characters. It’s witty, tongue-in-cheek, and timeless. If like me you judged this show by its premise, then I hope you’ll give it a shot now!

If you already love the show but don't own it, or if I've convinced you to give it a go, you can start your collection cheap on Amazon here:

Buffy the Vampire Slayer - The Complete First Season (Slim Set)

I am excited to see what you think about the show, or if you think I left a quintessential episode out of the list below.

Favorite Episodes:

• “Innocence” (Season 2)
• “Becoming, Part 2” (Season 2)
• “Earshot” (Season 3)
• “The Prom” (Season 3)
• “Living Conditions” (Season 4)
• “Fear Itself” (Season 4)
• “Hush” (Season 4)
• “New Moon Rising” (Season 4)
• “The Gift” (Season 5)
• “Once More with Feeling” (Season 6)
• “Tabula Rasa” (Season 6)
• “As You Were” (Season 6)
• “Selfless” (Season 7)
• “Touched” (Season 7)
• “Chosen” (Season 7)

LITERATURE

What’s this, you say? TV Literature? I know, many people find this to be an oxymoron. However, I think it exists. It is an elusive beast, but I plan to try to hunt it down throughout this blog. But before I dive in, let’s discuss what this might look like. I think a great place to start is the very definition of literature, and how tv could possibly fit in.

Merriam-Webster: writings in prose or verse; especially: writings having excellence of form or expression and expressing ideas of permanent or universal interest

Webster’s: The class of writings distinguished for beauty of style or expression, as poetry, essays, or history, in distinction from scientific treatises and works which contain positive knowledge; belles-lettres.

Dictionary.com: writings in which expression and form, in connection with ideas of permanent and universal interest, are characteristic or essential features, as poetry, novels, history, biography, and essays.

So what does this say about the chances that a television program could qualify? Well, the news is not good. All of these definitions cite the written word as a critical feature of literature. Clearly, this immediately excludes any other medium (including television and film). So, in the interest of our exercise, I am going to ignore the medium and focus instead on the content. Based on these definitions and others, here is my list of The Critical Elements of Literature (according to Emmy):

• Characters that evolve over the course of the entire story
• A central, developing storyline that has buildup, climax, and resolution
• Some emotional heft (audience has to be engaged in the story)
• Exploration of one or more universal themes
• Use of literary conventions such as metaphor or alliteration

So tv may not fit the literary mold perfectly. But I don’t think that should preclude a discussion of the literary elements inherent of many of the best programs out there, today and in the past. From here on out, I will be working from the assumption that tv can and sometimes does aspire to literary standing, medium notwithstanding.

Just like in written literature, there is a spectrum with television programs, from tabloids to Shakespeare and Faulkner. Well, on second thought, I can’t think of any television Faulkner. But there is definitely some solid Stephen King caliber work out there. (Which brings me to a whole other discussion on genre.) Much of what is out there right now is right along the tabloid or smut lines –The Hills, The Bachelor, The Bachelorette. There is also a lot of pure entertainment value stuff out there – Law and Order, Parks and Recreation, Glee. There’s nothing wrong with these programs. If your favorite weeknight activity is to sit down with your kitty, puppy, significant other, or mug of hot chocolate and take in an episode of Dancing with the Stars, then great! It’s just not my cup of tea. Don’t get me wrong – some of my favorite shows to watch are those pure entertainment value programs (John Grisham caliber tv?) like Modern Family, Parks and Recreation, and Glee. And I’ll probably talk about those a bit too because they sometimes reflect clutch literary elements.

But what I am most interested in discussing here is the material that really embraces the quintessential elements of literature, at least as I define them. This is irrespective of genre (a topic soon to be discussed). I will not hit on every example of tv lit. There is a lot out there that I hear is wonderful, but may just not be my style, or perhaps I just haven’t had a chance to check it out yet. Hopefully I’ll get some good feedback from my reader(s) on this!

In the interest of full warning, I may well insert some pop culture-y discussions. I just can’t help myself sometimes – I just have to know what is going on with Kristin Bell these days, or if they are really crazy enough to be thinking about a Buffy revival. But I’ll try to keep it pertinent, interesting, and fun. I look forward to hearing what you think!